In the file visa/LocalDataflow.h, there's a TODO statement that suggests improving the handling of Local Dataflow and turning it into a class. The TODO also mentions an assumption about escaped instructions and a potential change from a map to a vector or set. I was wondering if the implementation of this is complete yet.
TODO Statement:
Line19: // ToDo: move Local dataflow here and make it a class
Line 39: // If BB is not in the map, it means we need to run analysis for this BB
// ToDo: assumption is that there should not be many escaped inst. Can change
// to vector to set later if desired.
It would be beneficial to address this TODO by implementing the proposed changes. By moving Local Dataflow into a class and optimizing the analysis process, we can potentially improve the efficiency and maintainability of the code.
I do not have the coding knowledge to implement this change, but I would love to learn. Any advice is appreciated.
In the file
visa/LocalDataflow.h, there's a TODO statement that suggests improving the handling of Local Dataflow and turning it into a class. The TODO also mentions an assumption about escaped instructions and a potential change from a map to a vector or set. I was wondering if the implementation of this is complete yet.TODO Statement:
It would be beneficial to address this TODO by implementing the proposed changes. By moving Local Dataflow into a class and optimizing the analysis process, we can potentially improve the efficiency and maintainability of the code.
I do not have the coding knowledge to implement this change, but I would love to learn. Any advice is appreciated.