Visualize Kubernetes & DevSecOps Workflows. Tracks changes/events real-time across your entire K8s clusters, git repos, container registries, SBOM, Vulnerability foot print, etc. , analyzing their effects and providing you with the context you need to troubleshoot efficiently. Get the Observability you need, easily.
[!Note]
:green_circle: Risk threshold not exceeded.
Change Summary (click to expand)
The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy :robot:.
Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues
but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.
**Summary:**
This pull request includes several changes across different files in the `github.com/intelops/kubviz` project. The key changes include updates to the project's dependencies, additions of mocking libraries for testing, and updates to the `trivy_image.go` file responsible for running Trivy image scans and publishing the results.
From an application security perspective, the changes generally appear to be focused on improving the testing and development infrastructure of the project, which can have a positive impact on the overall security of the application. The addition of mocking libraries and the updates to the `trivy_image.go` file suggest a focus on improving the testability and reliability of the container image scanning process, which is a crucial aspect of application security.
However, it's important to note that the `ExecuteCommand` function in the `kubescore_test.go` file could potentially be a source of security vulnerabilities if not properly sanitized or validated. Additionally, the mock implementation in the `trivy_client_mock.go` file does not appear to include input validation, error handling, authorization, or logging and monitoring functionality, which are important security considerations for a real-world application.
**Files Changed:**
1. **`go.mod`**: The changes update the project's dependencies, adding new mocking libraries and updating the version of an existing dependency. This is generally a positive change, as it helps ensure the project is using the latest versions of libraries, which may include security fixes.
2. **`agent/kubviz/plugins/kubescore/kubescore_test.go`**: The changes introduce new tests for the `kubescore` package, covering the `publishKubescoreMetrics`, `ExecuteCommand`, and `publish` functions. While the tests appear to be focused on improving the testability of the package, the `ExecuteCommand` function should be reviewed to ensure that user input is properly sanitized and validated.
3. **`go.sum`**: The changes update the project's dependency versions, which is a good security practice to ensure the project is using the latest versions of libraries.
4. **`agent/kubviz/plugins/trivy/trivy_image.go`**: The changes introduce a new `JetStreamContextInterface` and improvements to the Trivy image scanning process, including caching, error handling, and Opentelemetry instrumentation. These changes are generally positive from a security perspective, as they help improve the reliability and observability of the image scanning process.
5. **`mocks/trivy_client_mock.go`**: The changes introduce a mock implementation of the `JetStreamContextInterface`. While this is a useful tool for testing, the mock implementation does not appear to include input validation, error handling, authorization, or logging and monitoring functionality, which are important security considerations for a real-world application.
Hi there :wave:, @dryrunsecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
Powered by DryRun Security