Visualize Kubernetes & DevSecOps Workflows. Tracks changes/events real-time across your entire K8s clusters, git repos, container registries, SBOM, Vulnerability foot print, etc. , analyzing their effects and providing you with the context you need to troubleshoot efficiently. Get the Observability you need, easily.
Hi there :wave:, @dryrunsecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
DryRun Security
Status
Findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
IDOR Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
SQL Injection Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Server-Side Request Forgery Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Secrets Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
[!Note]
:green_circle: Risk threshold not exceeded.
Change Summary (click to expand)
The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy :robot:. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.
**Summary:**
The provided code changes are related to the `TestExecuteCommand` function in the `kubescore_test.go` file. The changes involve commenting out a test case that checks for command execution errors. While this change does not directly introduce any obvious security vulnerabilities, it is worth considering the potential implications on the application's overall robustness, error handling, and monitoring capabilities.
The removal of the test case for command execution errors may reduce the overall test coverage and make it harder to catch regressions or unintended behavior. Additionally, proper error handling for command execution failures is important to ensure the application can gracefully handle and respond to such situations. Furthermore, the absence of this test case may suggest that the application's logging and monitoring capabilities related to command execution should be reviewed to ensure that any issues can be detected and investigated effectively in a production environment.
**Files Changed:**
- `agent/kubviz/plugins/kubescore/kubescore_test.go`: The changes in this file involve commenting out a test case that checks for command execution errors in the `TestExecuteCommand` function. While this change does not directly introduce any obvious security vulnerabilities, it may have implications on the application's overall robustness, error handling, and monitoring capabilities.
Hi there :wave:, @dryrunsecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
Powered by DryRun Security