Visualize Kubernetes & DevSecOps Workflows. Tracks changes/events real-time across your entire K8s clusters, git repos, container registries, SBOM, Vulnerability foot print, etc. , analyzing their effects and providing you with the context you need to troubleshoot efficiently. Get the Observability you need, easily.
Hi there :wave:, @dryrunsecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
DryRun Security
Status
Findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Server-Side Request Forgery Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
IDOR Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
SQL Injection Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Secrets Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer
:white_check_mark:
0 findings
[!Note]
:green_circle: Risk threshold not exceeded.
Change Summary (click to expand)
The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy :robot:. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.
**Summary:**
The code changes in this pull request span several files, primarily related to GitHub Actions workflows and the configuration of the Kuberhealthy service. From an application security perspective, the key points to highlight are:
1. **GitHub Actions Workflows**: The changes to the `.github/workflows/agent-container-pr.yml` and `.github/workflows/agent-kubviz-pr.yml` files focus on building and pushing Docker images for the container agent and the "kubviz-agent" component. The use of the `GITHUB_TOKEN` secret as a build argument is a security-sensitive aspect that should be carefully reviewed to ensure the token is not exposed.
2. **Kuberhealthy Configuration**: The changes to the `agent/config/config.go` file introduce default values for the `KuberhealthyURL` and `PollInterval` fields. While this can be a convenient feature, it's important to ensure that the default values do not introduce any security or functional issues, and that the configuration is easily customizable for different environments.
3. **Test Coverage**: The changes to the `agent/kubviz/plugins/kubescore/kubescore_test.go` file remove a test case that was checking the error handling for command execution. This could potentially leave a gap in the test coverage, and it's important to ensure that the application can handle unexpected command execution errors gracefully.
**Files Changed:**
1. `.github/workflows/agent-container-pr.yml`:
- Removes an empty line at the end of the file.
- Uses the `GITHUB_TOKEN` secret as a build argument for the Docker image.
2. `agent/config/config.go`:
- Introduces default values for the `KuberhealthyURL` and `PollInterval` fields in the `KHConfig` struct.
3. `agent/kubviz/plugins/kubescore/kubescore_test.go`:
- Removes a test case that was checking the error handling for command execution.
4. `.github/workflows/agent-kubviz-pr.yml`:
- Builds and pushes a Docker image for the "kubviz-agent" component.
- Runs tests and generates a coverage report, with a 60% coverage threshold.
- Uploads the coverage report as an artifact.
- Uses the `GITHUB_TOKEN` secret as a build argument for the Docker image.
Hi there :wave:, @dryrunsecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
Powered by DryRun Security