ja4db analyzer, closes #2361

[g4ze]

closes #2361

Description

Please include a summary of the change and link to the related issue.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).

Checklist

• [x] I have read and understood the rules about how to Contribute to this project
• [x] The pull request is for the branch develop
• [x] A new plugin (analyzer, connector, visualizer, playbook, pivot or ingestor) was added or changed, in which case:
  • [x] I strictly followed the documentation "How to create a Plugin"
  • [x] Usage file was updated.
  • [ ] Advanced-Usage was updated (in case the plugin provides additional optional configuration).
  • [x] I have dumped the configuration from Django Admin using the dumpplugin command and added it in the project as a data migration. ("How to share a plugin with the community")
  • [ ] If a File analyzer was added and it supports a mimetype which is not already supported, you added a sample of that type inside the archive test_files.zip and you added the default tests for that mimetype in test_classes.py.
  • [ ] If you created a new analyzer and it is free (does not require any API key), please add it in the FREE_TO_USE_ANALYZERS playbook by following this guide.
  • [ ] Check if it could make sense to add that analyzer/connector to other freely available playbooks.
  • [ ] I have provided the resulting raw JSON of a finished analysis and a screenshot of the results.
  • [x] If the plugin interacts with an external service, I have created an attribute called precisely url that contains this information. This is required for Health Checks.
  • [x] If the plugin requires mocked testing, _monkeypatch() was used in its class to apply the necessary decorators.
  • [x] I have added that raw JSON sample to the MockUpResponse of the _monkeypatch() method. This serves us to provide a valid sample for testing.
• [ ] If external libraries/packages with restrictive licenses were used, they were added in the Legal Notice section.
• [x] Linters (Black, Flake, Isort) gave 0 errors. If you have correctly installed pre-commit, it does these checks and adjustments on your behalf.
• [ ] I have added tests for the feature/bug I solved (see tests folder). All the tests (new and old ones) gave 0 errors.
• [ ] If changes were made to an existing model/serializer/view, the docs were updated and regenerated (check CONTRIBUTE.md).
• [ ] If the GUI has been modified:
  • [ ] I have a provided a screenshot of the result in the PR.
  • [ ] I have created new frontend tests for the new component or updated existing ones.
• [x] After you had submitted the PR, if DeepSource, Django Doctors or other third-party linters have triggered any alerts during the CI checks, I have solved those alerts.

Important Rules

• If you miss to compile the Checklist properly, your PR won't be reviewed by the maintainers.
• Everytime you make changes to the PR and you think the work is done, you should explicitly ask for a review. After being reviewed and received a "change request", you should explicitly ask for a review again once you have made the requested changes. { "os": null, "notes": null, "device": null, "library": null, "verified": false, "application": null, "ja4_fingerprint": "t13d1517h2_8daaf6152771_b0da82dd1658", "ja4h_fingerprint": "ge11cn20enus_60ca1bd65281_ac95b44401d9_8df6a44f726c", "ja4s_fingerprint": null, "ja4t_fingerprint": null, "ja4x_fingerprint": null, "ja4ts_fingerprint": null, "observation_count": 1, "user_agent_string": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36", "ja4tscan_fingerprint": null, "certificate_authority": null, "ja4_fingerprint_string": "t13d1517h2_002f,0035,009c,009d,1301,1302,1303,c013,c014,c02b,c02c,c02f,c030,cca8,cca9_0005,000a,000b,000d,0012,0017,001b,0023,0029,002b,002d,0033,4469,fe0d,ff01_0403,0804,0401,0503,0805,0501,0806,0601" },

[mlodic]

gtg, just migrations alignment. I'd do AdGuard -> ja4 -> goresym

[g4ze]

Cool! Any specific reasons on why that pattern?

[mlodic]

no reasons, just to help you with the migrations changes

[g4ze]

this can be merged merged after #2363