Criminalip_Scan analyzer closes#1240

[g4ze]

closes #1240

Description

Please include a summary of the change and link to the related issue.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).

Checklist

• [x] I have read and understood the rules about how to Contribute to this project
• [ ] The pull request is for the branch develop
• [ ] A new plugin (analyzer, connector, visualizer, playbook, pivot or ingestor) was added or changed, in which case:
  • [ ] I strictly followed the documentation "How to create a Plugin"
  • [ ] Usage file was updated.
  • [ ] Advanced-Usage was updated (in case the plugin provides additional optional configuration).
  • [ ] I have dumped the configuration from Django Admin using the dumpplugin command and added it in the project as a data migration. ("How to share a plugin with the community")
  • [ ] If a File analyzer was added and it supports a mimetype which is not already supported, you added a sample of that type inside the archive test_files.zip and you added the default tests for that mimetype in test_classes.py.
  • [ ] If you created a new analyzer and it is free (does not require any API key), please add it in the FREE_TO_USE_ANALYZERS playbook by following this guide.
  • [ ] Check if it could make sense to add that analyzer/connector to other freely available playbooks.
  • [ ] I have provided the resulting raw JSON of a finished analysis and a screenshot of the results.
  • [ ] If the plugin interacts with an external service, I have created an attribute called precisely url that contains this information. This is required for Health Checks.
  • [ ] If the plugin requires mocked testing, _monkeypatch() was used in its class to apply the necessary decorators.
  • [ ] I have added that raw JSON sample to the MockUpResponse of the _monkeypatch() method. This serves us to provide a valid sample for testing.
• [ ] If external libraries/packages with restrictive licenses were used, they were added in the Legal Notice section.
• [ ] Linters (Black, Flake, Isort) gave 0 errors. If you have correctly installed pre-commit, it does these checks and adjustments on your behalf.
• [ ] I have added tests for the feature/bug I solved (see tests folder). All the tests (new and old ones) gave 0 errors.
• [ ] If changes were made to an existing model/serializer/view, the docs were updated and regenerated (check CONTRIBUTE.md).
• [ ] If the GUI has been modified:
  • [ ] I have a provided a screenshot of the result in the PR.
  • [ ] I have created new frontend tests for the new component or updated existing ones.
• [ ] After you had submitted the PR, if DeepSource, Django Doctors or other third-party linters have triggered any alerts during the CI checks, I have solved those alerts.

Important Rules

• If you miss to compile the Checklist properly, your PR won't be reviewed by the maintainers.
• Everytime you make changes to the PR and you think the work is done, you should explicitly ask for a review. After being reviewed and received a "change request", you should explicitly ask for a review again once you have made the requested changes. resp.json

[gitguardian[bot]]

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 2 secrets following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secrets in your pull request

| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | | | -------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------ | ---------------- | --------------- | -------------------- | | [6639150](https://dashboard.gitguardian.com/workspace/399891/incidents/6639150?occurrence=161826949) | Triggered | Generic Password | d9ebc73de1e75522ec056fdf1045fe7bc7a18e96 | frontend/tests/components/auth/Login.test.jsx | [View secret](https://github.com/intelowlproject/IntelOwl/commit/d9ebc73de1e75522ec056fdf1045fe7bc7a18e96#diff-5e31c1265e7ad979f122981896cb037b866119ec2d81d5a8b9d78f04038db975L51) | | [6639150](https://dashboard.gitguardian.com/workspace/399891/incidents/6639150?occurrence=161826950) | Triggered | Generic Password | d9ebc73de1e75522ec056fdf1045fe7bc7a18e96 | frontend/tests/components/auth/Login.test.jsx | [View secret](https://github.com/intelowlproject/IntelOwl/commit/d9ebc73de1e75522ec056fdf1045fe7bc7a18e96#diff-5e31c1265e7ad979f122981896cb037b866119ec2d81d5a8b9d78f04038db975R48) |

🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets

1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code. 2. Replace and store your secrets safely. [Learn here](https://blog.gitguardian.com/secrets-api-management?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) the best practices. 3. Revoke and [rotate these secrets](https://docs.gitguardian.com/secrets-detection/secrets-detection-engine/detectors/generics/generic_password#revoke-the-secret?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment). 4. If possible, [rewrite git history](https://blog.gitguardian.com/rewriting-git-history-cheatsheet?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment). Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data. To avoid such incidents in the future consider - following these [best practices](https://blog.gitguardian.com/secrets-api-management/?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials - install [secret detection on pre-commit](https://docs.gitguardian.com/ggshield-docs/integrations/git-hooks/pre-commit?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

---

^{🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.}

[g4ze]

I'm not sure if I exactly get what you mean, the migrations seem to be in the expected order here..? 0111 and 0112...

[mlodic]

yes but you changed the 0111 which is already in place so actually I would prefer to keep it like it is and add the new analyzer migration in the 0112. In this way there are no strange conflicts for other people working in the develop branch