Closed elemoine closed 8 years ago
Yes, that is why. I had made a comment about the config policy rule on PR #7, but I guess it was not added.
@marcin-krolik
@tiffanyfj @elemoine Indeed, it's my fault. I forgot about it somehow. I will fix that.
No worries. Lots of comments to keep track of. Thanks @marcin-krolik !
@marcin-krolik Thanks. Please coordinate with @obourdon, who might have started on that.
@marcin-krolik in fact I have started working on uniformizing the way plugins get their config starting with CPU: see one of my local commits and was planning to get the same code across all plugins in turn
@obourdon thanks! It looks good, go ahead with it.
@marcin-krolik @elemoine : don't know who can close this issue has the corresponding PR has been merged
Oops sorry I thought it was merged but seems like it is still pending :-(, seems kind of weird to me because merge commit is effectively in master. I do not understand why we are in this situation.
I used this in my workflow definition:
When I do
snapctl metric get -m /intel/procfs/disk/loop0/io_time
I get this:The issue is that there is no
proc_path
rule!The "swap" plugin, for example, does not have the same issue:
I guess this has to do with the rule created by the "swap" plugin in the
GetConfigPolicy
function.