Closed imjalpreet closed 8 years ago
Just a heads up, in the first version, we'll go with priority 1 items only and once we have extractors and writers, we'll be able to quickly add priority 2 items.
@oparoz I will update it then.
I think the name of the index should be changed
@oparoz Okay, I will change it. Do you have any suggestions? I mean are there any rules to be followed while naming it?
There are a few conventions, but what bothers me in the current version is that image_size
is not meaningful.
Something like idx_id
per example would be pretty explicit: Index for for field id
.
Done.
Thanks!
@oparoz Do you want anymore changes in this?
Could you just rebase it?
@oparoz I rebased it.
Thank you :)
@oparoz I have updated the database.xml file. Please check if everything is correct. I have tested it.