Closed jtfirek closed 1 year ago
Creating a list of assumptions I made for went this is ready for pr review:
circulatingSupply
.
Code here:
https://github.com/interlay/interbtc-squid/blob/561197505bcd7833ed9733eaa6291ead57595eee/src/mappings/event/circulating-supply.ts#L32
I am doing it based off this math but I am not sure if an increase in total supply will result in an injection into the circulatingSupply
Math: total_issuance - total_locked - total_reserved - system_account_supply
https://github.com/interlay/interbtc-squid/pull/108#issuecomment-1503638864Hi @gregdhill and @nud3l,
Thanks for all the helpful info in this thread: #108
I understand how we're using the variables total_issuance
, total_locked
, total_reserved
, and system_account_supply
to calculate the circulating supply. This makes sense given the logic we've discussed.
However, I'm not clear on how we should calculate totalVestingTokens
and totalEscrowTokens
fields that @nud3l would like to see in the cumulativeSupply object. Could you clarify how we should derive these variables? Can the total_locked
, total_reserved
, and system_account_supply
be used directly here?
Also @gregdhill I have a few questions on Token Pallet events:
Do I need to track all four of these for the total_locked
, The events seems super redundant. Could I get alway with only tracking 2 of them?
https://github.com/open-web3-stack/open-runtime-module-library/blob/0085382cf001704d084ac8e97b7bc3e4e8afb8a7/tokens/src/lib.rs#L333-L357
I have been having trouble trying to listen to this event. Is it possible that we didn't use this event to set the initial supply? https://github.com/open-web3-stack/open-runtime-module-library/blob/0085382cf001704d084ac8e97b7bc3e4e8afb8a7/tokens/src/lib.rs#L310-L313
However, I'm not clear on how we should calculate
totalVestingTokens
andtotalEscrowTokens
fields that @nud3l would like to see in the cumulativeSupply object. Could you clarify how we should derive these variables?
Take a look at the orml-vesting
events to update totalVestingTokens
and the escrow pallet events to update totalEscrowTokens
- note that would only give the KINT/INTR amount not in vKINT/vINTR.
Do I need to track all four of these for the
total_locked
, The events seems super redundant. Could I get away with only tracking 2 of them?
I think you just need to use Locked
and Unlocked
to calculate total_locked
.
I have been having trouble trying to listen to this event. Is it possible that we didn't use this event to set the initial supply?
It is possible, for the total supply we can just initialize using some constant value.
I think you just need to use
Locked
andUnlocked
to calculatetotal_locked
.@gregdhill When I try to generate types for these events. I get an error that these events are not included in the chain metadata. So I decided to tracked the
lockSet
andlockRemoved
instead, but thelockRemoved
event does not include the amount removed.
I am currently blocked here.
Closing PR as it was replaced with #124
I was accidentally working on my master branch in the other pr for #94. So I closed it and opened this one inside with a new branch. Linking the closed pr for reference: https://github.com/interlay/interbtc-squid/pull/108