Open michielbdejong opened 6 years ago
This plugin, together with https://github.com/interledgerjs/ilp-plugin-xrp-asym-client and https://github.com/ripple/ilp-plugin-xrp-paychan, define the paychan-related protocols from https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/issues/381. I think the RFCs repo should describe only the ilp protocol, because the info, channel, fund_channel, channel_signature, claim, last_claim, ripple_channel_id etc. protocols are specific to XRP, and they would be different if you use Ethereum-based payment channels.
channel
fund_channel
channel_signature
claim
last_claim
ripple_channel_id
I re-opened interledger/rfcs#381 as I think we should document some general best practice for using payment channels and reference how it is done with the XRP plugins.
This plugin, together with https://github.com/interledgerjs/ilp-plugin-xrp-asym-client and https://github.com/ripple/ilp-plugin-xrp-paychan, define the paychan-related protocols from https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/issues/381. I think the RFCs repo should describe only the ilp protocol, because the info,
channel
,fund_channel
,channel_signature
,claim
,last_claim
,ripple_channel_id
etc. protocols are specific to XRP, and they would be different if you use Ethereum-based payment channels.