Open DuncanDHall opened 2 years ago
Old issue raised by Jeff Kaplan in 2017 in Jira: https://webarchive.jira.com/browse/OL-317
When a book's archive.org/metadata lists publication date as "[18--?]" it shows up in openlibrary as specifically "1800".
"[18--?]"
"1800"
https://archive.org/details/plaintalesfromth00kipliala https://archive.org/metadata/plaintalesfromth00kipliala https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7197646M/Plain_tales_from_the_hills
Interpret this form of date metadata differently, perhaps as "1800s"?
@JeffKaplan @mekarpeles @hornc
Related discussions on edition date issues: #806 #2039 #2711 #3391 #3421 #3496 #3746 #5333 #6021 #6038
tldr: consensus is to convert to, store, and sort on EDTF formats
Old issue raised by Jeff Kaplan in 2017 in Jira: https://webarchive.jira.com/browse/OL-317
When a book's archive.org/metadata lists publication date as
"[18--?]"
it shows up in openlibrary as specifically"1800"
.Evidence / Screenshot (if possible)
https://archive.org/details/plaintalesfromth00kipliala
https://archive.org/metadata/plaintalesfromth00kipliala
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7197646M/Plain_tales_from_the_hills
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16824525/178803232-c801b47b-2f06-456b-9ca5-aed3ae53c416.png)
Proposal & Constraints
Interpret this form of date metadata differently, perhaps as "1800s"?
Stakeholders
@JeffKaplan @mekarpeles @hornc