Open seabelis opened 7 months ago
Wouldn't it be better to query OpenLibrary than Internet Archive? The first scanned volume that that query returns is included because a user review includes the word "thriller" which seems like a dubious inclusion criterium.
No objection. I'm ultimately suggesting the authors not be the search term.
What about this? https://openlibrary.org/search?q=subject%3Athrillers+ratings_count:[1+TO+*]&mode=everything&sort=random.hourly&has_fulltext=true
Note the random sort; currently we sort by recently returned, but we won't be able to do that.
It timed out 2/3 times that I tried it, but modulo that, I think it's an improvement.
Error. Hmm... Sorry. There seems to be a problem with what you were just looking at.
We've noted the error 2024-04-10/152624830521 and will look into it as soon as possible. Head for home?
Gah sorry folks I made a typo in my url! That's what I get for trying to change the url directly :P I fixed it it should work now.
Better. Let's do ratings_count:[2 TO *]. I'm pretty sure someone added a bunch of 1 star ratings to lots of items right when we launched that feature.
Four out of six of these titles are not thrillers.
Problem
The Thriller carousel on the homepage queries specific authors which means the same works always appear, and also non-thrillers appear by those authors.
Evidence / Screenshot
Relevant URL(s)
Reproducing the bug
Context
Notes from this Issue's Lead
Proposal & constraints
Change the query to https://archive.org/search?query=openlibrary_work%3A%28*%29+AND+collection%3A%28inlibrary%29+AND+%28lending___available_to_browse%3Atrue+OR+lending___available_to_borrow%3Atrue%29+AND+%28%22thriller%22%29&sort=-downloads.
Related files
Stakeholders