Closed cheginit closed 2 years ago
Are you sure about those last two? I don't have time to dig into things (and I found a bug I need to fix) but it seems like they are not really in the vicinity of the gage. Maybe I'm not looking at things right.
These are the flowline-station distances in meters:
I used NLDI's position endpoint to get the nearest comid. The last two sound far from the stations.
OK -- yeah, that's what I'm seeing.
So it seems like there just is no flowline for the two that are far away?
No, there's no nearby flowline in nhdplus mr, but there are in nhdplus hr:
OK, re: the one you found missing, I found the issue. It was superseded by 04127917 -- but the record wasn't combined. In my source of network locations that is the highest quality, they dropped 04127918. I will bring these cases back in our next release of locations to the NLDI.
Regarding the ones that are far from a medium res flowline -- I don't think we should put those into the NLDI as indexed gages. We don't currently have a hybrid approach though. I just opened https://github.com/ACWI-SSWD/nldi-crawler/issues/126 to track the issue.
FYI -- @cheginit the site that was the original source of this issue has been fixed. https://labs.waterdata.usgs.gov/api/nldi/linked-data/nwissite/USGS-04127918?f=json
That's great! Thanks.
The following USGS station is not indexed:
ID: 04127918 nhdplusv2 comid: 12206226 nhdplusv2 reachcode: 04070002000042