Closed bwbroersma closed 2 days ago
@mxsasha I agree with the 'is this guaranteed to work' question in regards to only patch PGPy in the requirements of internet.nl, and still having a different PGPy version as sub-dependency of sectxt. I could not find it, so it might be quirky behavior indeed. Better wait for the DTC patch, or pin to the sectxt PR (and then as a result also the PGPy PR).
This is solved by either pinning sectxt to PR:
Or pinning PGPy to PR:
So the required PGPy will be:
Then this probe will run without hanging on the malformed PGP armor (
------
):