Open internityz opened 3 years ago
The UG did not state that 2 customers cannot share the same name, email or address. As such the application is working as intended.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: Throughout the UG, it did not mention anything regarding the phone number used to add contact being unique. Other sensitive information like name, address and email are able to be duplicated. The UG should state the handling of these information whether they are unique or not, otherwise it might cause confusion and inconvenience to users as they would not have any idea how the data is being logged into the app.
Team chose [type.DocumentationBug
]
Originally [type.FeatureFlaw
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Medium
]
Reason for disagreement: The severity should at least be Medium Throughout the UG, it did not mention anything regarding the phone number used to add contact being unique. Other sensitive information like name, address and email are able to be duplicated. The UG should state the handling of this information whether they are unique or not, otherwise, it might cause confusion and inconvenience to users as they would not have any idea how the data is being logged into the app.
Edit enables customers to be edited to have the same unique information which does not seem right. Even though the product addressed same name issue it should also handle checking of important unique information.