Added available sort options for all REST API endpoints that allow sorting

[monotasker]

:heart: Thank you for your contribution!

Description

Added documentation on the sort options available for all REST API endpoints that allow sorting.

Checklist

Ticks in all boxes and 🟢 on all GitHub actions status checks are required to merge:

• [X ] I'm aware of the code of conduct.
• [X ] I've created logical separate commits and followed the commit message format.
• [X ] I've added relevant test cases.
• [X ] I've added relevant documentation.
• [X ] I've marked translation strings (for relevant code).
• [X ] I've followed the CSS/JS and React guidelines (for relevant code).
• [X ] I've followed the web accessibility guidelines (for relevant code).
• [X ] I've followed the user interface guidelines (for relevant code).
• [X ] I've identified the copyright holder(s) and updated copyright headers for touched files (>15 lines contributions).
• [X ] I've NOT included third-party code (copy/pasted source code or new dependencies).

Third-party code

If you've added third-party code (copy/pasted or new dependencies), please reach out to an architect.

Reminder

By using GitHub, you have already agreed to the GitHub’s Terms of Service including that:

1. You license your contribution under the same terms as the current repository’s license.
2. You agree that you have the right to license your contribution under the current repository’s license.

[monotasker]

Okay, I've made the minor changes to default option ordering, removed the table of vocab options (leaving a description of the defaults), and fixed the missing file extensions in the links. Should be good to go.

[fenekku]

Hmm something is off with the links (see https://github.com/inveniosoftware/docs-invenio-rdm/actions/runs/8582061590/job/23563183805?pr=612), but at least one other PR is potentially affected: https://github.com/inveniosoftware/docs-invenio-rdm/actions/runs/8526851030/job/23356983728?pr=614 ... I will add this as something I will look into this month as part of preparations for v12 since we need to make sure docs are good. Can you rebase it to see if that fixes it?

[monotasker]

Okay, I rebased my branch but it doesn't seem to have fixed the issue. When I build the docs locally I get the same error: not from links in the documentation text but because of two missing style files: /assets/stylesheets/main.10ba22f1.min.css and /assets/stylesheets/palette.06af60db.min.css. These are linked in the frontpage_base.html template, and the files do indeed seem to be missing. I don't think this is related to any of my changes. Maybe something happened upstream that is just becoming visible here? (Or maybe I'm missing something!)

[fenekku]

Indeed something is strange. If you don't mind, when I look into it, may I push to your branch to fix it? This will be faster and you've already done the heavy lifting, so you shouldn't have to deal with that structural problem :wink: .

[monotasker]

Sure. No problem

[fenekku]

Merged it here: https://github.com/inveniosoftware/docs-invenio-rdm/pull/619 (@monotasker 's master branch is probably protected so I couldn't push to it). I think Nico fixed the issue by resetting the clean options: https://github.com/inveniosoftware/docs-invenio-rdm/commit/c6e7334fe0a9386d1db42fe499cd5c53947be556#diff-1db27d93186e46d3b441ece35801b244db8ee144ff1405ca27a163bfe878957fR41 . Kind of strange nevertheless.

Thank you!