datamodel: create datacite model based on zenodo

[ppanero]

InvenioRDM data model

• DataCite JSON Schema and PDF version.
• Translate all camel to snake case.
• Let's shorten common structures like schemeURI/valueURI -> scheme/value

Metadata fields

• [x] Resource Type (resourceTypeGeneral)
  • {'resourceTypeGeneral': ..., 'resourceType': ...} -> {'type': ..., 'subtype': ...}
  • Cannot use the CV from DataCite.
  • We should have a mapping from internal types to DataCite types
  • Two level type: Type and Subtype (see Zenodo implementation).
• [ ] Identifiers:
  • wait
• [ ] Creators: See https://github.com/inveniosoftware/invenio-rdm-records/issues/19
  • Use DataCite
• [x] Titles
  • title (string field)
  • additional_titles (like DataCite titles)
• [ ] Publisher:
  • Use DataCite
  • (to be discussed in detail)
• [x] Publication Year:
  • Use publication_date instead. Must be a valid date. In the future we can support extended time format or similar to represent only years.
• [ ] Subjects
  • Use DataCite
  • To be investigated if we can simplify
• [ ] Contributors: See https://github.com/inveniosoftware/invenio-rdm-records/issues/19
  • Use DataCite
• [x] Dates
  • Use DataCite (and see Zenodo implementation)
  • Special dates: publication_date, embargo_date.
  • How to deal with Embargo Date?
  • Check Zenodo for description text
• [x] Language
  • Use DataCite
• [ ] Alternate and Related Identifiers:
  • Use DataCite
  • Issues with naming and metadata schema
  • Issue with resourceTypeGeneral
• [ ] Sizes
  • Use DataCite
  • sizes. Not present in Zenodo, followed DataCite. Questions:
    • Shall we separate the unit (e.g. MB) from the number? This would be helpful for sorting/filtering.
    • Shall it be only one size in the file? Do we want metadata sizes too?
• [ ] Formats
  • Use DataCite Questions:
    • Shall it be only one format in the file? Do we want metadata formats too (This does not make much sense IMHO)?
• [x] Version:
  • Use DataCite
• [x] Rights list:
  • Use DataCite
  • TO be understood if we can use it to link to a license vocabulary or we need a separate license field.
• [x] Descriptions:
  • description (string field)
  • additional_descriptions (like DataCite descriptions)
  • How does it relate to Zenodo notes field (Note, abstract, descriptions).
  • GeoLocations:
  • Use Zenodo (see needs a description text)
• [ ] FundingReference:
  • Use DataCite
  • However, we need to understand like with licenses/rights how to link to a controlled vocabulary.

Extras for all

• Add references (need to check zenodo structure if ok). Not all has related identifiers, sometimes is just a reference to the text.
• internal notes (discuss with ILS what they have). "curators notes", non-public notes.
• Access right. Discuss _access TBD in the future.
• Access condition

How to hanlde custom fields?

• See Zenodo implementation (custom)

Zenodo custom fields

• Imprint
• Journal
• Part of?
• Thesis

TODO

• Check against ILS schema.

Discussion points for community:

• Keywords or only subjects?

*CV: Control Vocabulary

[fenekku]

Can we merge this issue with #1 and then have one sub-issue per metadata field? This way we can keep track of our progress on each field and know when a field has been completely dealt with.

[ppanero]

First part addressed here: https://github.com/inveniosoftware/invenio-rdm-records/pull/21

[fenekku]

Merging this with #1