Closed steffansluis closed 10 years ago
I've sorted stuff out a bit and we are now supporting the first two option with grunt dist
and grunt bundle
. I've tested it and the bundle is indeed the only file you need to include to get tails working :) I'm still interested in your opinions about this though.
So, I've been working on this for a while now but I can't really find the right way to do this. When running
grunt build
, the coffeescript gets compiled into javascript and concatenated into a file called tails.js by the coffeescript compiler. This file can be tested by usinggrunt jasmine
, which manages the dependencies by specifying them as vendor libraries.This leaves the user to do this manually when he actually wants to use tails, which is not a problem, but a lot of unnecessary trouble we really should avoid on behalf of the user. A simple solution is to concatenate all the dependencies with tails.js to a new file, say bunde.js, and call that the build result. However, this could potentially lead to a lot of code duplication and it's ugly.
Then there is browserify, which gives you the ability to use a node-like
require
method in browers, so you can dynamically load stuff anywhere, and then backtracks your require calls to analyse and bundle your dependencies. Sound cool, but it's a bit of a pain setting it up correctly with grunt (I've given it a few too many tries) and I don't really think it's worth the trouble since it will bundle everything anyway so the only gain is the magic require function we don't really need. @joostverdoorn @rogierslag What's your take on this?