Relation update

[SchrodingersGat]

• Ref: https://github.com/inventree/InvenTree/discussions/8416
• Adds "note" field to PartRelated model
• Implement new table column in PUI

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for inventree-web-pui-preview ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	afb0f2f63f1190bcd4ff847350e5ef59f45f14ef
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/inventree-web-pui-preview/deploys/673cf9f9e470220009760275
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-8524--inventree-web-pui-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 100 (🟢 up 1 from production) Accessibility: 86 (no change from production) Best Practices: 100 (no change from production) SEO: 78 (no change from production) PWA: - View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 77.77778% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.63%. Comparing base (2bc6ddb) to head (afb0f2f). Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/backend/InvenTree/part/api.py	76.47%	4 Missing :warning:
src/frontend/src/tables/part/RelatedPartTable.tsx	33.33%	2 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #8524 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 84.52% 84.63% +0.10% ========================================== Files 1176 1178 +2 Lines 53555 53580 +25 Branches 2023 2025 +2 ========================================== + Hits 45265 45345 +80 + Misses 7785 7709 -76 - Partials 505 526 +21 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/inventree/InvenTree/pull/8524/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=inventree) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [backend](https://app.codecov.io/gh/inventree/InvenTree/pull/8524/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=inventree) | `85.96% <83.33%> (+0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [pui](https://app.codecov.io/gh/inventree/InvenTree/pull/8524/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=inventree) | `69.36% <33.33%> (+0.57%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=inventree#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[wolflu05]

We might could also overengineer this by adding a second table like relation types which can be selected. That way we can keep this field much clear/filter/… by common relations types. E.g. show all additional equipment relations, … But that’s just a thought

[matmair]

Using a state would probably be user-friendly as custom states would make it easy to extend the selection without adding new interfaces that need management functionality and discovery. That could be added as a separate PR to keep this one in the imminent 0.17.0

[wolflu05]

Using a state would probably be user-friendly as custom states would make it easy to extend the selection without adding new interfaces that need management functionality and discovery. That could be added as a separate PR to keep this one in the imminent 0.17.0

@matmair should we create an issue to track this then? Maybe you could do that with you ideas about the custom states? I'm not so familiar with the new state system.