Open wagnerhitss opened 4 years ago
Good morning dear,
This is happening because the authentication rule isn't matching so no role is being assigned to the node.
This isn't a bug in PacketFence but the fact that it shows a scary SQL error isn't good since it gives a false impression of a bug.
@jrouzierinverse, could you check to get this caught because it spits out this error and provide a better logging statement (like 'no role has been found for the device')
@wagnerhitss, please use the mailing list to get your actual issue fixed as this is a configuration issue and not an actual bug
Dearest regards
Ok Julien,
Thanks for the feedback, I will use the mailing list.
graciously
Solution: Try to make person_add before we create node in DB. Need to check if it works in read-only mode.
Good afternoon dear,
I have the following problem: In my organization we have deployed packetfence version 8 and we want to upgrade to version 9.3 Zen. However, we are unable to approve it due to a BUG in the self registration of the computers' mac address. Below is a part of the log:
No role specified or found for pid ANA \ pereira (MAC d0: 94: 66: db: ee: 7d); assumes maximum number of registered nodes is reached (pf :: node :: is_max_reg_nodes_reached) plpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa (9837) ERROR: [mac: d0: 94: 66: db: ee: 7d] max nodes per pid met or exceeded - registration of d0: 94: 66: db: ae: 7d to ANA \ pereira failed (pf :: registration :: setup_node_for_registration) plpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa (9837) ERROR: [mac: d0: 94: 66: db: ee: 7d] auto-registration of node failed max nodes per pid met or exceeded (pf :: radius :: authorize) plpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa (9837) ERROR: [mac: d0: 94: 66: db: ee: 7d] Database query failed with non retryable error: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (
pf
.node
, CONSTRAINT0_57
FOREIGN KEY (tenant_id
,pid
) REFERENCESperson
(tenant_id
,pid
) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE) (errno: 1452) [ INSERT INTOnode
(autoreg
,bandwidth_balance
,bypass_role_id
,bypass_vlan
,category_id
,computername
,detect_date
,device_class
,device_manufacturer
,device_score
,device_type
,device_version
,dhcp6_enterprise
,dhcp6_fingerprint
,dhcp_fingerprint
,dhcp_vendor
,last_arp
,last_dhcp
,last_seen
,lastskip
,mac
,machine_account
,notes
,
regdate,
sessionid,
status,
tenant_id,
time_balance,
unregdate,
user_agent,
voip) VALUES (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, NOW (),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
autoreg=?,
Last_seen= NOW (),
pid=?,
Status=?,
Tenant_id` =?] {Yes, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 2020 -03-13 19:08:50, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, d0: 94: 66: db: ae: 7d, NULL, NULL, ANA \ pereira, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, NULL, reg, 1, NULL, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, NULL, no, yes, ANATEL \ pereira, reg, 1} (pf :: dal :: db_execute)Note: Authentication is aimed at the AD server, We have a rule, and function for the vlans of each Switch and even so it is not possible to register automatically by 802.1x.
Sincerely,
Wagner Morais Network analyst