search

invisibleXML / ixml

Invisible XML
GNU General Public License v3.0
48 stars 7 forks source link

Alternative syntaxes for prolog #234

Open cmsmcq opened 4 months ago

cmsmcq commented 4 months ago

On 15 December 2023, Steven Pemberton proposed some alternative syntaxes for the ixml prolog, illustrated by the following samples.

 [ixml version "1.1"]
 <ixml version "1.1">
 (ixml version "1.1")

or without using "ixml" to label the contents:

[version "1.1"]
(version "1.1")
<version "1.1">

SP expressed a preference for the (version "1.1") syntax.

spemberton commented 4 months ago

I realised, for people who would like to see "ixml" that we could delete the 'version' and just use

 (ixml "1.1")

Steven

On Monday 04 March 2024 20:26:35 (+01:00), C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:

On 15 December 2023, Steven Pemberton proposed some alternative syntaxes https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2023Dec/0006.html for the ixml prolog, illustrated by the following samples.

[ixml version "1.1"] <ixml version "1.1"> (ixml version "1.1")

or without using "ixml" to label the contents:

[version "1.1"] (version "1.1") <version "1.1">

SP expressed a preference for the (version "1.1") syntax.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/234 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACNIXLYFUR6DGYAW3ZPJEKTYWTDGXAVCNFSM6AAAAABEFZBOOSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE3DONJYGIZTSMA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.