Closed apardods closed 2 weeks ago
It's a good point that GOBL structs have a scope that could potentially exceed that of EN16391 and putting the metadata directly in the structs, while convenient, may not makes any sense in other contexts.
It's also true that mapping may not always be direct or trivial and additional notes to indicate special details may also be useful or necessary.
Thank you for this PR, it's more comprehensive than FacturX documentation 😄
Closing this one in favor of #401
Added tags for GOBL objects mapping them to their correspondent EN 16931 Business Term (BT) or Business Group (BG).