search

iobis / obis-wall

0 stars 0 forks source link

globes #1

Open pieterprovoost opened 6 years ago

pieterprovoost commented 6 years ago

@pieterprovoost will look into plotting the globes.

Todo:

pieterprovoost commented 6 years ago

Maybe it's better to use Mollweide projection instead of globes (makes it hard to cover all areas).

This is (1) number of records, (2) distribution of HAB species + HAEDAT events and (3) threatened species:

wardappeltans commented 6 years ago

@pieterprovoost please create Mollweide globes for:

  1. completeness change to "estimate number of undiscovered species"
  2. potential extinctions
pieterprovoost commented 6 years ago

undiscovered

Undiscovered species based on number of species and completeness (because apparently chao2 is often lower than the observed number of species).

Good news by the way, on the mid-ocean ridge between Brazil and Cape Verde we have discovered 70 species and have only 4 to go :wink:

pieterprovoost commented 6 years ago

Regarding potentially extinct, is this (1) number of globally potentially extinct species per grid cell, or (2) number of species potentially extinct from each cell? I assume 2?

wardappeltans commented 6 years ago

Ik denk dat het bestaande product #1 is maar #2 is mss wel interessanter als de grid groot genoeg is.

From: Pieter Provoost notifications@github.com Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 10:24:57 AM To: iobis/obis-wall Cc: Appeltans, Ward; Comment Subject: Re: [iobis/obis-wall] globes (#1)

Regarding potentially extinct, is this (1) number of globally potentially extinct species per grid cell, or (2) number of species potentially extinct from each cell? I assume 2?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/iobis/obis-wall/issues/1#issuecomment-376439425, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOflnxK8h2ib7--oith7euSYiaJfURInks5tifdYgaJpZM4SPI48.

pieterprovoost commented 6 years ago

Correctie, ik ga ervan uit dat we 1 nodig hebben. De aantallen die 2 gaat geven zullen een pak hoger zijn en nog veel meer afhankelijk van sampling effort.

samuelbosch commented 6 years ago

Is 1 ook niet afhankelijk van sampling effort, plaatsen waar vroeger gekeken werd en nu niet meer?

wardappeltans commented 6 years ago

ok, #1 dus. @samuelbosch ja vandaar dat we het "potential extinctions" noemen.

pieterprovoost commented 6 years ago

Soorten met minstens 10 records, niet meer gezien na 1970.

extinct