Closed MathewBiddle closed 3 months ago
add some capacity to gather requirements / user needs
Some questions I would like to answer before we proceed:
@laurabrenskelle any thoughts on the above questions? I think we can start with a blank slate and work from there...
Mainly I'm curious about the name of the repo marine_life_data_network
. Does that make sense?
url would be https://github.com/ioos/marine_life_data_network
I think the name seems fine.
I could envision using this repo to work on notebooks related to marine life data synthesis and biodiversity variables. But also to track issues for data or project management. What other things are you thinking might go in this repo?
A project board would be interesting to start and see if we find it helpful. I think it might be easier to start with the project board as part of the workflow than to try to implement it later. Possibly the Roadmap and/or a Kanban style project board? I could see the Roadmap one being useful to plan future work, and the Kanban version as useful for tracking work in progress.
@laurabrenskelle I've been thinking... What different purpose would this marine life repo serve, that https://github.com/ioos/mbon-docs is not serving now? I'd really like to get away from categorizing the DMAC work we are doing as "MBON". Instead it is IOOS Marine Life. Maybe we should just rename that repository?
If we do a rename to the repository, what happens to the ioos.github.io/mbon-docs website? What would need to change and where?
I think the project board could be added and referenced to from any repository?
True, I think IOOS Marine Life is bigger than just MBON, though the MBON projects are part of it. Are RAs doing marine life monitoring/observing that is not part of an MBON project? Are there other marine life observations we're missing by focusing on MBON? I see your point that any marine life observation work could just as easily use the same information as the mbon-docs. Maybe that should become marinelife-docs to serve as a one stop shop for how to share marine life observations with NOAA/IOOS/NCEI and OBIS?
I know MBON is trying to think about synthesis, but I think that is really key to IOOS Marine Life. The reason IOOS Marine Life is not just another data access portal for marine observations is that it is intended to offer actionable information about species distributions, trends, and indicators relating to essential variables to stakeholders in policymaking and conservation. I think having a dedicated repo/space to discuss what this looks like with folks from NMFS, ONMS, etc. might be helpful.
And yes, my understanding is that GitHub project boards can include issues from different repositories, not just the one it was made under.
Repository name
marine_life_data_network
Repository purpose
Planning efforts relevant to IOOS Marine Life and IOOS DMAC.
Repository description
Planning and executing marine life efforts.
Repository type
Public
Repository license
BSD 3-Clause
Repository options
Specify a .gitignore file type
No response
Specify GitHub usernames or IOOS GitHub Team for repository access
mathewbiddle