Closed kwilcox closed 4 years ago
@kwilcox this isn't part of your PR but I noticed it because of one of the tests you added. If a climatology isn't defined for the given time range (and/or depth), then we mark it as qc flag MISSING:
https://github.com/ioos/ioos_qc/blob/b7030748e041720ee14708f68ef42a9ba27114d5/ioos_qc/qartod.py#L360
Shouldn't that be NOT EVAL instead? The data isn't missing, we just didn't run tests there because they weren't defined for that time/depth.
@kwilcox this isn't part of your PR but I noticed it because of one of the tests you added. If a climatology isn't defined for the given time range (and/or depth), then we mark it as qc flag MISSING:
https://github.com/ioos/ioos_qc/blob/b7030748e041720ee14708f68ef42a9ba27114d5/ioos_qc/qartod.py#L360
Shouldn't that be NOT EVAL instead? The data isn't missing, we just didn't run tests there because they weren't defined for that time/depth.
I agree!
Fixes #16 and #19.
Some pep/flake/deprecation cleanup as well.