Closed jessicaaustin closed 3 years ago
@kwilcox could you please review?
@lukecampbell if you have a chance, could you please check the distance calcs specifically?
Thanks!
moving_platforms
is a very Axiom-heavy term... but does describe this well. We could start with a platforms
folder and nest different types there (ioos_qc/platforms/moving
)? I don't feel strongly, we can leave it like this and see how it grows.
We could also have a contrib
or general
module that contains these higher-level tests that are applicable to many different types of data and are not described by a specific testing manual.
Yeah I was trying to think of something generic; "moving platforms" sounded generic enough to me? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It could describe gliders, AUVs, floats, animals, etc.
We could also call it argo
-- the ARGO QC manual describes both the speed test and the pressure check (both on pg 7). That would fit the pattern of naming modules after manuals.
Or we could just have a "general" module so we don't have to worry so much about what bucket a test falls into.
Let's go with either argo
or general
and put the pressure check there as well. Your call.
Ok I'm gonna do argo
. That's what my heart says
Ok @kwilcox i'm happy with merging this if you are
Addresses https://github.com/ioos/ioos_qc/issues/36
Changes:
argo
glider
module and movedglider.pressure_check
toargo.pressure_increasing_test
argo.speed_test
qartod.location_test
whenrange_max
is usedutils
so they can be shared betweenqartod
andmoving_platforms
-- nothing changed during the moveQuestions/discussion for reviewers:
Thoughts on the-- resolved, see comments belowmoving_platforms
module? is the name ok? any desire to group withgliders
?