Fixed issue in spike_test where the ref array was not getting initialized as a masked array. This was causing some values that should result in a masked restult to use the underlying value stored in the masked array to be using in the calculation resulting in incorrect results.
For example, with the following input:
[101, 102, --, 104, 105]
The resulting output should be:
[2, 9, 9, 9, 2]
However, with the ref array initialized as a non masked array the following is the result:
[2, 1, 9, 9, 2]
The affected tests were also updated to reflect the correct behavior.
kwilcox
commented
3 years ago
Fixed issue in spike_test where the ref array was not getting initialized as a masked array. This was causing some values that should result in a masked restult to use the underlying value stored in the masked array to be using in the calculation resulting in incorrect results.
For example, with the following input: [101, 102, --, 104, 105] The resulting output should be: [2, 9, 9, 9, 2] However, with the ref array initialized as a non masked array the following is the result: [2, 1, 9, 9, 2]
The affected tests were also updated to reflect the correct behavior.