Closed ocefpaf closed 1 year ago
We ran into problems using pygc
, the same that are documented in this issue. We could add the loop parameter to pygc
and then update that repo for GHA, cut a new version, etc. Or we could just copy and paste a pure python method into this repo that converges. I don't have a strong preference.
We ran into problems using
pygc
, the same that are documented in this issue. We could add the loop parameter topygc
and then update that repo for GHA, cut a new version, etc. Or we could just copy and paste a pure python method into this repo that converges. I don't have a strong preference.
I can fix and do a new release. While vendoring that code here makes sense I do have other projects that may require the same "pyproj great circle drop" and will benefit from this. PRs incoming...
Sent https://github.com/axiom-data-science/pygc/pull/6 and https://github.com/axiom-data-science/pygc/pull/7 your way but I've been thinking about using geographiclib
instead. It is a solid library, well maintained, pure Python, and nailed this issue down already. What do you think? It would be one less lib to care for :-)
@kwilcox pyproj requires a wheel when using
pip
or theproj
dependency when using a package manager. Would it be OK to use pygc or some other great circle computation instead? Using pyproj just for that is kind of on overkill.My goal is to make
ioos_qc
installable and 100% usable on platforms whereproj
and binaries wheels are hard to install.