Gichigami-20110629T1821 actualy contains many deployments

[kwilcox]

The Gichigami-20110629T1821 ERDDAP/THREDDS dataset actually contains 10 deployments with the same wmo_id

• gichigami-20110629T1821
• gichigami-20110630T2049
• gichigami-20110701T0123
• gichigami-20110701T1556
• gichigami-20110702T1048
• gichigami-20110703T0859
• gichigami-20110704T0352
• gichigami-20110705T1936
• gichigami-20110706T1754
• gichigami-20110707T0056

I couldn't find another dataset using this format. Should these be split up into different deployments by the glider DAC, or is this format going to be common going forward? I thought the base unit for a Glider DAC dataset in THREDDS and ERDDAP was a single Deployment?

[kerfoot]

She must have put them all in the same directory and we have erddap set up to aggregate by time AND trajectory.

I'll ask her to delete the files and make sure to upload to the proper directories.

John

On Nov 2, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Kyle Wilcox notifications@github.com wrote:

The Gichigami-20110629T1821 NetCDF file and ERDDAP/THREDDS dataset actually contains 10 deployments with the same wmo_id

gichigami-20110629T1821 gichigami-20110630T2049 gichigami-20110701T0123 gichigami-20110701T1556 gichigami-20110702T1048 gichigami-20110703T0859 gichigami-20110704T0352 gichigami-20110705T1936 gichigami-20110706T1754 gichigami-20110707T0056 I couldn't find another dataset using this format. Should these be split up into different deployments by the glider DAC, or is this format going to be common going forward? I thought the base unit for the Glider DAC dataset (netcdf file/thredds/erddap) was a single Deployment?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[kknee]

@kwilcox unfortunately this data provider has since left the UMD lab. We'll attempt to fix these deployments manually.

[kknee]

@lukecampbell this is all set, yes?

[lukecampbell]

Yes