Closed lohithmunakala closed 3 years ago
Check out this pull request on
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
@MathewBiddle @ocefpaf are these fails common because the others PR's seem to have the same issue?
The PR is massive, 615 files changed! That is quite hard to deal with.
One way to reduce would be to reset the changes in the notebooks. Changes like this one: https://github.com/ioos/notebooks_demos/pull/409/files#diff-7c024449328887c11902b4b4b457ee5a50f32dc94de8fcc7422bb9c9810f9ca0
Can you do that? Also, please confirm upstream if we need to commit the _build
directory. That would also reduce the noise level on the PR. Or maybe we can commit them in another PR?
Yes I will do that. Will look at reducing the redundancy of the PR
I have removed all the build files to keep the initial PR clean. Please check and let me know @ocefpaf.
I have removed all the build files to keep the initial PR clean. Please check and let me know @ocefpaf.
This is great. We are down to 53 files :-) much easier to review.
Please take a look at my comments at your convenience.
I have removed all the build files to keep the initial PR clean. Please check and let me know @ocefpaf.
This is great. We are down to 53 files :-) much easier to review.
Please take a look at my comments at your convenience.
I have made quite some changes to the _config.yml
file. Included the above changes and made it easier to understand and included all the default values too (that were previously not included).
@ocefpaf, there is a new format for the _toc.yml
file in the latest update (0.11.1) for jupyter{book}. I have changed the _toc.yml according to that. https://github.com/ioos/notebooks_demos/pull/409/commits/d84e8699aab2ccb2c683a08e4d0d9367ce9c8766
@lohithmunakala this may look like the "easy" part but I guess you saw that the devil is in the details! You did an awesome work and hopefully the next PRs will be more fun coding rather than infrastructure discussion. Congrats on your first GSoC PR merged!
@lohithmunakala this may look like the "easy" part but I guess you saw that the devil is in the details! You did an awesome work and hopefully the next PRs will be more fun coding rather than infrastructure discussion. Congrats on your first GSoC PR merged!
@ocefpaf, @MathewBiddle Thanks to you guys! You've been helpful all the way!
There was a notebook issue and that has been resolved. This is with respect to the PR https://github.com/ioos/notebooks_demos/pull/408 and https://github.com/ioos/notebooks_demos/pull/394 . The updated branch without conflicts is mentioned here.
The view is the same as shown in #408.
@ocefpaf please let me know if this is fine.