Merge outstanding pull requests

[dpsnowden]

All, there are 7 outstanding pull requests. Can you please decide a way to divide the work and get these new results merged? We're trying to write up some results and need to be able to see the latest and greatest. It looks like many of the PRs fail the travis-ci checks so I'm not sure what is involved.

@Bobfrat @birdage @kwilcox @kknee @ocefpaf @wckoeppen

Anyone?....Bueller?

[ocefpaf]

There are 3 tests in the current travis-ci setup that breaks down as:

• test_environments.py Just a place holder this test is not implemented.
• test_notebooks.py Will probably fails 99.99% of the time since it runs all notebooks. The failures range from timeouts to missing/bad files and/or URLs.
• test_system-test_rules.py Maybe the only test that we should pay attention. Checks for the existence of corresponding .py files, pip-requirements.txt and conda-requirements.txt.

The PR #199 runs only test_system-test_rules.py, that way the travis output has some meaning and might help review the pending PRs. Here is an example of the output (go straight to the end of the file)

The outstanding PRs are:

• [X] #197 Tidying up miscellaneous directories and apparently abandoned files @duncombe
• [X] #194 Cosco Busan Scenario, and reverted the *.txt line from .gitignore @kwilcox
• [X] #188 GitHub for Windows friendly file paths in Theme 3 @kwilcox
• [X] #182 Update temp notebook @Bobfrat
• [X] #179 Initial commit of winds extremes nb @Bobfrat
• [X] #202 Fix travis ci @ocefpaf
• [X] #177 Theme 2 Scenario 2A, Update usgs notebook @birdage
• [X] #173 updates on bob's temperature test @rsignell-usgs

[birdage]

ill look at #177 today

[jkupiec]

We are now down to 3 open pull requests. Can anyone provide some resolution?

[kknee]

@birdage and @ocefpaf are actively working on #177, looks like we're waiting for @rsignell-usgs to comment on #173.

[ocefpaf]

There are no outstanding PR. (I closed #173 today.)