[Feedback][Pre-Val-Workshop] General Metadata - Githubissues

iop-alliance / OpenKnowHow

A metadata specification to enable the collection of distributed, standardised metadata of open source hardware designs

GNU General Public License v3.0

1 stars 0 forks source link

[Feedback][Pre-Val-Workshop] General Metadata #54

Open moedn opened 3 years ago

moedn commented 3 years ago

How's your gut feeling about this data?
What are most essential fields for you?
Would you manually fill out this TOML template to submit your OSH to LOSH?
Any information / data fields you miss?

moedn commented 3 years ago

[FLB-OTC]

mentioned as essential field:

licensing terms (e.g. is attribution needed; copyleft variant; other special terms (like early CERN versions))

(comment from researcher: license is a mandatory field already; but more details could be displayed in the frontend, especially for users that are not familiar with licenses)

moedn commented 3 years ago

[FLB-OTC]

recommendation:

add clarification why BoMs are not displayed (#74)

moedn commented 3 years ago

[FLB-OTC]

recommendation for data input:

having the template as part of the 'uploading process'

moedn commented 3 years ago

[FLB-OTC]

group feedback:

not much motivation for (manually) filling out TOML templates

moedn commented 3 years ago

moedn commented 3 years ago

[Malte-Cluster]

looks good :) (but hard to judge)

also looks easy to fill out; if benefit is clear, we'd do it

fields: funding model; incentives for contribution

moedn commented 3 years ago

moedn commented 3 years ago

concept of meta-machines (product models)
is the metadata machine-readable?

--

filling out manifest files:

in a survey-like interface: maybe :)
not text (depending on how familiar users are with coding etc.) ("this is not for me" if it's code for people that are not familiar with it)