Open fmessmer opened 8 years ago
:+1: Even though this will be a lot of work. Also, I think that it would make a lot of sense to have the information about "subscribed/published topics/services/action as well as configurable parameters" in a Readme.md as well. However, the problem is that this would actually require to do the work twice.
And as far as I see, it is not easy to convert the Readme.md to the wiki syntax due to the different special characters etc...
I think a duplicate documentation is not desired as it would introduce sync'ing efforts on top of the efforts required for actually keeping one documentation up-to-date....
I'd vote for wiki-doku!
there are a view tools that can be used for auto-generation of basic docu:
@ipa-fmw @ipa-nhg @ipa-mig @ipa-bnm @ipa-rmb
As we now have consequently reviewed and beautified our repositories and code, the next step commendable contribution to the ROS community could/should be to tend our attention to documentation!
I.e. we should:
I guess a minimum wiki documentation should include a meaningful description (from package.xml) and a descriptions of the ROS interfaces, i.e. subscribed/published topics/services/action as well as configurable parameters....)