ipfs-inactive / dynamic-data-and-capabilities

[ARCHIVED] Dynamic Data and Capabilities in IPFS Working Group
59 stars 6 forks source link

Cryptographic ACL #4

Open pgte opened 6 years ago

pgte commented 6 years ago

Goal: The path towards a Identity & Capability System on IPFS is clear

awgneo commented 6 years ago

Hello @pgte, is there any way I can follow your research and first approach? I am very interested in ACL on IPFS.

awgneo commented 6 years ago

I am also down to assist in this effort in any way @pgte. :) Let me know if I can help.

pgte commented 6 years ago

Thanks Alex!

You can help in many ways. If you have experience or ideas in this subject, you can list some alternatives here. Or you can give feedback once alternatives are presented here. Thanks for your interest!

On 22 Mar 2018, 16:53 +0000, Alex Groleau notifications@github.com, wrote:

I am also down to assist in this effort in any way @pgte. :) Let me know if I can help. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

awgneo commented 6 years ago

@pgte is there a way I can get to the actual research completed thus far? I don't seem to see any links to anything in this issue.

pgte commented 6 years ago

There's nothing written down. Just dispersed personal knowledge. It would be great to start compiling the State of the Art in research and papers and decentralised platforms (and some platforms may be interesting too to investigate, like Matrix.org, for instance).

pgte commented 6 years ago

Here is a very old survey about ACLs in networked FS (probably useless, or perhaps some gems could be found here): https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130&context=cis_reports

pgte commented 6 years ago

Matrix.org:

pgte commented 6 years ago

Tahoe LAFS:

https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs

Somewhere in this doc capabilities are discussed: https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/docs/architecture.rst