I was wondering whether there have been conflicts between IPFS and Privacy Badger and as I didn't see anything on PB issue tracker, I turned to a search engine and met this sight:
Opening it I saw that it's from Wikipedia and checking robots.txt confirmed that it's the top one that robots aren't allowed to access. However simple Disallow isn't enough to prevent it from appearing in search results, there must also be Noindex. Google has stopped supporting noindex in 2019-09-01 according to deepcrawl.com, so I don't know what to say about this issue, but I am at least bringing it to your awareness if you hadn't already encoutnered it.
I was wondering whether there have been conflicts between IPFS and Privacy Badger and as I didn't see anything on PB issue tracker, I turned to a search engine and met this sight:
*https://duckduckgo.com/?q=privacy+badger+ipfs
Opening it I saw that it's from Wikipedia and checking robots.txt confirmed that it's the top one that robots aren't allowed to access.
However simpleGoogle has stopped supporting noindex in 2019-09-01 according to deepcrawl.com, so I don't know what to say about this issue, but I am at least bringing it to your awareness if you hadn't already encoutnered it.Disallow
isn't enough to prevent it from appearing in search results, there must also beNoindex
.I think https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93710 is the answer