ipfs / awesome-ipfs

Community list of awesome projects, apps, tools, pinning services and more related to IPFS.
https://awesome.ipfs.tech/
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
4.26k stars 530 forks source link

chore: Remove broken links #443

Closed github-actions[bot] closed 9 months ago

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

Automated PR created by .github/workflows/broken_link_cron.yml

ipfs-gui-bot commented 1 year ago
Fails
:no_entry_sign: Found 10 link issues
Messages
:book: YAML data files were edited.

Link issues by awesome_bot

Line Status Link
63 Error http://ethlance.com
Failed to open TCP connection to ethlance.com:80 (getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution)
70 Error https://infinitebooru.com
Failed to open TCP connection to infinitebooru.com:443 (getaddrinfo: Name or service not known)
84 404 https://github.com/ReForum-ipfs/ReForum#readme
84 404 https://github.com/ReForum-ipfs/ReForum
94 503 https://ipjot.herokuapp.com/
123 Error https://tallylab.com/
Failed to open TCP connection to tallylab.com:443 (Connection timed out - connect(2) for 173.236.218.249:443)
145 404 https://pascalprecht.github.io/posts/content-identifiers-in-ipfs/
146 404 https://pascalprecht.github.io/posts/future-proofed-hashes-with-multihash/
209 404 https://github.com/aanupam23/go-stellar-ipfs
247 Error https://orion.siderus.io
Failed to open TCP connection to orion.siderus.io:443 (getaddrinfo: No address associated with hostname)

Generated by :no_entry_sign: dangerJS against 4fcc23117356ca9747df18f1d55f696f8763ab53

2color commented 1 year ago

The problem with these PRs is that they remove the link but leave the project.

I don't think there's much utility in leaving the project without a URL.

@SgtPooki What do you think?

SgtPooki commented 1 year ago

The problem with these PRs is that they remove the link but leave the project.

I don't think there's much utility in leaving the project without a URL.

@SgtPooki What do you think?

These PRs require a manual intervention, but I saw it as a win because it's a call to action for removing invalid items, and modifying the code in the existing PR has been fairly easy.. I'm good either way as I think we're going to be more hands-off with this repo (higher priorities elsewhere) and let the community push things forward as they like.

2color commented 1 year ago

Makes sense. After an initial sweep, we shouldn't have too many of these anyways.

Good to know though for future PRs.

Thanks for cleaning this one. I think we can merge this,

2color commented 9 months ago

Closing this PR as we now have a new structure and all the broken links have been removed.