Closed lidel closed 11 months ago
cc @galargh for sanity check + if we need to safelist this repo somewhere for this to work (i tried to set
CI_BUILD_RUNS_ON
but https://github.com/ipfs/distributions/actions/runs/5799417224/job/15719370344 was stuck waiting for free runner and i cancelled it).
Yes, we do! I'll do that first thing tomorrow morning.
We have access to self-hosted runners here now 🥳 but we do need to make some adjustments before we update the CI_BUILD_RUNS_ON
var. E.g. https://github.com/ipfs/distributions/actions/runs/5836552866/job/15830374575 - we'll need to update the ipfs setup action so that it works on self-hosted. I'll get back to it next week.
Edit: I fixed the setup ipfs action. We'll see how far it takes us.
Edit2: Looks like we're getting stuck at/after comparing versions with /ipfs/QmQAqFeyrqvLR1m8TWugeQojhzTKp1ASxTicM3sPru1ULF/kubo/versions
This change produced no new differences in built artifacts.
@galargh rebased, is the issue gone?
Seems so, I think we're good to go 😁 I'll take the vars in a sec.
This change produced no new differences in built artifacts.
This change produced no new differences in built artifacts.
The goal is to make it faster, this PR aims to test if using self-hosted runner speeds up release build.
If it is ok, we can decide to set CI_BUILD_RUNS_ON on this repo instead.
cc @galargh for sanity check + if we need to safelist this repo somewhere for this to work (i tried to set
CI_BUILD_RUNS_ON
but https://github.com/ipfs/distributions/actions/runs/5799417224/job/15719370344 was stuck waiting for free runner and i cancelled it).