Closed MichaelMure closed 1 month ago
Thank you for submitting your first issue to this repository! A maintainer will be here shortly to triage and review. In the meantime, please double-check that you have provided all the necessary information to make this process easy! Any information that can help save additional round trips is useful! We currently aim to give initial feedback within two business days. If this does not happen, feel free to leave a comment. Please keep an eye on how this issue will be labeled, as labels give an overview of priorities, assignments and additional actions requested by the maintainers:
Finally, remember to use https://discuss.ipfs.io if you just need general support.
Sounds like a good idea. PR would be great. Either move it to internal or remove it if no longer needed.
@gammazero here is the PR: https://github.com/ipfs/go-cid/pull/169
As I understand,
_rsrch/cidiface
is an engineering experiment package to explore the right form for a CID. As such, it's not meant to be actually used, and could result in conflict if used. There is definitely value in that package, if only to document design choices.My (admittedly little) issue is that my IDE keeps suggesting me to import that package, and sometimes does. It would be way less confusing for everyone if
_rsrch/cidiface
would be moved intointernal/_rsrch/cidiface
or something similar.