Closed hannahhoward closed 2 years ago
This would just be sugar, right? A fairly straightforward message construction internally that lets the caller skip all the messy bits and just provide requestid and extension data?
Yes with the caveat that it checks against in progress requests and responses to figure out whether to send a request or response.
I also wonder if this should just be called "SendUpdate"
In order to get all data transfer libp2p messages into the protocol, we should add an imperative "SendExtensions" call to the top level interface.
This call would: