Open larsks opened 9 years ago
This makes sense. I'm wary of having to add error responses for a ton of headers, but we should probably support this.
breaking out the gateway into its own repo would probably help speed up its development. we should do that right after 0.4.0 lands
I tried
POST
ing amultipart/form-data
request to the ipfs http api which contained a part with base64 encoded content:If IPFS isn't going go handle the
Content-transfer-encoding
header then it should reject the request, rather than silently accepting it and storing the base64 encoded content.