Open magik6k opened 6 years ago
Hey @magik6k, if you did't finish this work and offical team decide to do this , i am willing to help you do for this. It also will help me learn more about ls
and unixfs
. Thx a lot.
@magik6k currently, some go-unixfs
functions are refactoring: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/5217 and https://github.com/ipfs/go-unixfs/issues/3.
so, I think this issue could wait until the issues mentioned above are fixed. However, it is also a good choice to solve this issue firstly.
WDYT?
The reason why i did not fix it immediately is this featuren may cause breanking.Also the issue should influence js-ipfs
.So this issue need to be considered carefully by offical team,
@kjzz I don't have any experience with js-ipfs
. If this issue will influence js-ipfs
, maybe it should be handled with care.
@magik6k In my own view, it's better to fix https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/5502 firstly.
ipfs file ls
is this command which duplicates half of the normalls
functionality and missing the other half (plus seems to be a bit outdated).IMO we should just remove it and merge it's functionality with the normal
ls
(first commit which mentions it: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/commit/434871ba18662db366907e358654728a357f9c0e)