Open jbenet opened 8 years ago
I would love feature like that. I have few sites on IPFS already and all apart from one can be redirected under ipfs.io
only problem is that telling users normal URL to the site is much, much simpler than telling them to type in ipfs.io/ipns/bin.kubuxu.ovh
.
@Kubuxu this already works today. You can add CNAME
or A
records to your domain pointing to the gateway, the gateway will transparently serve /ipns/bin.kubuxu.ovh
. we do this today with https://ipfs.io and http://dist.ipfs.io (we should make a blog post / guide for this cc @RichardLitt @lgierth)
Here i'm proposing making it less transparent (at least for our sites, and at least for now)
I know but I want to redirect it under ipfs.io/ipns/bin.kubuxu.ovh
, user still has to type bin.kubuxu.ovh
but lands on ipfs.io/ipns/bin.kubuxu.ovh
and if he wants to share it he copies the ipfs.io/...
version.
(Same reason why I always type ipns:bin.kubuxu.ovh
in my browser, less typing, sorry that I didn't made myself clear in the first place).
EDIT: CNAME
won't work until ipfs/go-ipfs#2191 is merged and deployed.
EDIT2: Also dist.ipfs.io
shouldn't be linked with https as the cert does not work for it.
EDIT3: Fixed wrong issue number above.
@Kubuxu thanks
When showing off that https://ipfs.io is really https://ipfs.io/ipns/ipfs.io many people have said that it's really a non-obvious fact, and that it would really help us (for now) to draw attention to this. I.e. the transparent working is really nice, but it also hides IPFS. We have IPFS-hosted sites that look like regular http sites and draw no difference. (yes, this is a good thing, but it does not help ipfs grow). It also makes some sites viewable through a local ipfs node with browser extensions trickier to find.
So, perhaps we can temporarily (say for 2016) make our ipfs-hosted websites redirect to the proper
/ipns/
path under the gateway, instead of the (very nice) transparent hosting:Notes:
302
or303
, so all links would continue to work.ipfs-gateway-transparent=true
or something), or this could be a var placed at the end of the dnslink record:dnslink=/ipfs/<hash> ipfs-gway-transparent
Would love to hear what you think.
cc interested people: @lgierth @diasdavid @Dignifiedquire @lidel @Kubuxu