search

ipfs / team-mgmt

IPFS Team Planning, Management & Coordination threads
https://github.com/ipfs/team-mgmt/issues
Other
267 stars 97 forks source link

Background Reading on Open Governance Models #209

Closed flyingzumwalt closed 7 years ago

flyingzumwalt commented 8 years ago

Over the coming weeks I want to talk about laying the groundwork for gradually and smoothly transition to an even more open, democratic governance model. This is something that deserves careful consideration and there's real benefit to starting the conversation early so that we have a lot of time to do the personal and organizational footwork that builds healthy patterns of communication, roles, responsibilities, accountability, etc. before they're needed.

This is related to the conversation about the Project Management Model but Governance is a distinct topic from Project Management that needs special attention.

To establish some common vocabulary and reference points, I recommend reading the sections on Benevolent Dictators and Consensus-based Democracy in Producing Open Source Software (BTW, The whole book is packed with useful advice)

This conversation impacts everyone. It's especially important for the Project Leads to read about, consider and discuss.

cc @jbenet @haadcode @diasdavid @whyrusleeping @dignifiedquire

flyingzumwalt commented 8 years ago

Project Leads, please read these materials before team week. They're very short.

dignifiedquire commented 8 years ago

Got the text on my kindle, will read on the plane

daviddias commented 8 years ago

I was just listening to the RFC podcast with Karl Fogel, the author of POSS, I recommend you also to listen to it:

I also had read POSS in the past, 💯 for the recommendation.

I learned and got interested to learn POSS after seeing Issac Schlueter talk at NodeConf: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSv7GIX-XQ0 (and then there was a continuation at RealtimeConf https://vimeo.com/77289729

daviddias commented 7 years ago

Added these resources to - https://github.com/ipfs/pm/pull/269

Can we considered this issue done?

zmackie commented 7 years ago

This issue sounds like it may be closing, but C4 may have something to add to the discussion. It's the "Collective Code Construction Contract" that ZeroMQ uses to great success.

flyingzumwalt commented 7 years ago

We should consider this particular issue done, but it brings up the need for a knowledge base (ie Wiki) where information like this can accumulate. It should be independent of Issues, which need to be closed at some point. We've often put "knowledge base" type info into documents within GH repositories, but that info quickly gets lost because GH wasn't designed for tracking knowledge bases in the git repositories -- search isn't optimized for it, editing flow is wrong, etc.

At some point I'll open a separate issue for discussing that. Right now it's not a high priority -- we can make our existing habits work for a bit longer.