Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Simon,
Prior to version 2.2.2e there was a bug in the calculation of the black and
white points for the screen display gamma stretch. The difference is most
pronounced when there is very little dynamic range, like your tests with the
lens cap covered. The bug caused the older versions to use an artificially
wide dynamic range, hence a less pronounced histogram stretch and a darker
display.
You will find that the camera data is exactly the same across versions and has
not changed. You can confirm this by doing File => Save Image which will save
the raw camera data (not the stretched version of the data that is displayed on
the screen) and look at the histograms in a fits image viewer.
You can get a darker display on the screen (similar to what you saw in 2.2.2d
and earlier) by sliding the gamma slider to the right. The underlying data
from the camera is the same, no more and no less noisy.
Andy
Original comment by andy.gal...@gmail.com
on 4 Jan 2015 at 6:59
Hi Andy,
Thank you for your reply. So far I haven't tried the latest version
on the stars as the weather hasn't been cooperative. I did try
moving the gamma slider all the way over to the right which did make
the image darker, though it was just as noisy, and still very
different to older versions. However, based on what you've said
this may be expected behaviour given the lack of signal with the lens
cap in place. Once I have some clear skies to work with I'll give
that a try and report back, though looking at the forecast it's
likely to be a week or two. In the meantime I'll try saving an
image from each version to compare the difference, as you've
described.
RegardsSimon
Original comment by si...@caracol.co.uk
on 4 Jan 2015 at 10:07
Hi Andy,
This is just to confirm that I have just saved FIT files in PHD 1.14 and 2.4.1
to compare the histograms. You are quite right, they both appear very similar.
I shall look forward to giving version 2 a proper test under the stars.
Original comment by si...@caracol.co.uk
on 5 Jan 2015 at 1:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
si...@caracol.co.uk
on 4 Jan 2015 at 5:14Attachments: