Closed Xmader closed 4 years ago
Merging #55 into master will increase coverage by
1.09%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #55 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.61% 85.71% +1.09%
==========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 13 14 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 11 12 +1
Misses 2 2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/index.js | 85.71% <100.00%> (+1.09%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1a93204...fa7b49d. Read the comment docs.
It's probably not a good idea to conflate the withIs
issue with TS support, for the sake of keeping things manageable and letting @Xmader actually make meaningful progress. I think we should just accept this change as a chunk, and file an issue stating a desire to move away from withIs
, although I'm not as concerned with it living here since we're moving away from this abstraction anyway (see js-block and js-multiformats) so this is previous-generation work.
Thanks everyone involved for this change and helping with the review.
https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs/issues/2945