Open rigelrozanski opened 5 years ago
“Process of rational discourse” perhaps that should be elaborated.
[AC - Define or expand on what a Process of rational discourse may look like]
should there not be any form of check in place to ensure that all members get an equal opportunity for discussion, and no member dominates the “rational discourse” process..?
Maybe - this is highly dependant on the platform used, ideally access to the discourse process occurs on the basis of a members genuine merits (as determined through some quantified peer-judgement mechanism - such as an "upvote" mechanism within forums)
What is the significance of including the words “unamended or amended agreement”?
Because maybe contending parties reach an understanding without the need to modify the agreement whatsoever. [AC - clarify this possibility in the main text]
@heyitsmerebecca REF #3
Consensus: “Process of rational discourse” perhaps that should be elaborated. “Openly consider and investigate all alternatives proposed by members involved in the consensus process.” - should there not be any form of check in place to ensure that all members get an equal opportunity for discussion, and no member dominates the “rational discourse” process..? I suppose that would partially depend on what the format of rational discourse is.
What is the significance of including the words “unamended or amended agreement”?