Closed fmikulu closed 6 years ago
Explanation of my preference 2nd - all these features are more flexible in component system:
But it can be solved in case of independent clibdpa with some additional wrappers in component indeed.
I would leave master clibdpa for iqrfd1 and develop clibdpa for iqrfd2. Once ready develop will be moved to master.
That's existing situation, so no change for now?
@spinarr are we ready to maintain old version in v1.0.0 branch and continue with clibdpa2 in master?
https://github.com/iqrfsdk/clibdpa/tree/master/Dpa
We can split indeed. Lets do it after freezing of v1.1.0 and continuation with v2 only in master branch
As we introduced clibdpa2 redesign, there is a question how to continue with clibdpa maintenance I can see these possibilities:
@spinarr @michal-konopa and others -Opinion?