Closed irajs closed 8 years ago
filed on m38228/v2
Reviewed and still needs edits
"Reviewed and still needs edits" leaves the editors with no idea what's wrong or how to fix it
I took notes during the meeting at to the actual edits intended.
Kilroy Hughes | Senior Digital Media Architect |Windows Azure Media Services | Microsoft Corporation [cid:image001.png@01CDABBA.71FD8800]http://www.windowsazure.com/media
From: David Singer [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 10:23 AM To: irajs/CMAF CMAF@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [irajs/CMAF] 2nd draft: Section 9.2.2 spatial samples intended for presentation (#50)
"Reviewed and still needs edits" leaves the editors with no idea what's wrong or how to fix it
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/irajs/CMAF/issues/50#issuecomment-222925204, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AC1hQoBb-8BmdgAJndWTHsFuS21Kr3SPks5qHUFGgaJpZM4IefSg.
added the phrase "after SPS cropping". needs diagram?
Resolved in the CD. The text was revised to remove normative requirements on the content in the elementary stream ("SHALL contain only samples intended for presentation"), and changed to make functional statements about cropping, etc. specified by referenced codec and container normative references. That clarifies which samples are presented so authors can infer how to encode samples intended for presentation, but does not create an untestable requirement on content.
Comment 29 “The video elementary stream SHALL contain only spatial samples intended for presentation after SPS cropping parameters are applied in the decoder. The Clean Aperture box SHOULD NOT be present.”
“spatial samples intended for presentation after SPS cropping parameters”. Examples in appendix.
ACTION: “add diagram, showing the whole story.”