Closed aachenhang closed 4 years ago
By the way, I found that training more iteration on the baseline can make the result better.
I have already sent the training log to you through the email.
I will close the issue. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me.
Hi,I have used your code and failed to reproduce the result. Here are my results.
I used the master branch. When load the imagenet weight, I skip 'conv1.weight' and 'layer1.0.conv1.weight' cause their shape is different with the official Resnet18. The results are all best IOU on the cityscape eval set during training.
- Baseline: 0.619
- Baseline + PI: 0.397
- Baseline + PI + PA: 0.414
- Baseline + PI + PA + HO: D_loss NAN
Could you send me your log?
I also have the same problem and cannot reproduce the result. Have you fixed this?
Hi,I have used your code and failed to reproduce the result. Here are my results.
I used the master branch. When load the imagenet weight, I skip 'conv1.weight' and 'layer1.0.conv1.weight' cause their shape is different with the official Resnet18. The results are all best IOU on the cityscape eval set during training.
Could you send me your log?