Closed gordonwatts closed 4 months ago
I assume "latest" is the list from #17? We probably want to optimize that list again towards the end to push performance a bit further (tracked in #25) but I am not aware of any progress on that issue.
Ah - ok - if that is the case, then we can do lots of data stress testing with the current list, which was from #17. I'll back off on this until that is updated, then!
Looking at @alexander-held current materalize branches:
BRANCH_LIST = [
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.pt", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.eta", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.phi", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.m",
"AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.pt", "AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.eta", "AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.phi",
"AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.m", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.pt", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.eta",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.phi", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.EnergyPerSampling", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.SumPtTrkPt500",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.TrackWidthPt1000", "PrimaryVerticesAuxDyn.z", "PrimaryVerticesAuxDyn.x",
"PrimaryVerticesAuxDyn.y", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.NumTrkPt500", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.NumTrkPt1000",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.SumPtChargedPFOPt500", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.Timing",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.JetConstitScaleMomentum_eta", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.ActiveArea4vec_eta",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.DetectorEta", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.JetConstitScaleMomentum_phi",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.ActiveArea4vec_phi", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.JetConstitScaleMomentum_m",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.JetConstitScaleMomentum_pt", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.EMFrac",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.Width", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.ActiveArea4vec_m", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.ActiveArea4vec_pt",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.DFCommonJets_QGTagger_TracksWidth", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.PSFrac",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.JVFCorr", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.DFCommonJets_QGTagger_TracksC1",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.DFCommonJets_fJvt", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.DFCommonJets_QGTagger_NTracks",
"AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.GhostMuonSegmentCount", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.muonSegmentLinks",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.msOnlyExtrapolatedMuonSpectrometerTrackParticleLink",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.extrapolatedMuonSpectrometerTrackParticleLink",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.inDetTrackParticleLink", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.muonSpectrometerTrackParticleLink",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.momentumBalanceSignificance", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.topoetcone20_CloseByCorr",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.scatteringCurvatureSignificance", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.scatteringNeighbourSignificance",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.neflowisol20_CloseByCorr", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.topoetcone20",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.topoetcone30", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.topoetcone40", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.neflowisol20",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.segmentDeltaEta", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.DFCommonJetDr",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.combinedTrackParticleLink", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.InnerDetectorPt",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.MuonSpectrometerPt", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.clusterLink",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.spectrometerFieldIntegral", "AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.ambiguityLink",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.EnergyLoss", "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.NNJvtPass", "AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.topoetcone20_CloseByCorr",
"AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.topoetcone20ptCorrection", "AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.topoetcone20",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptvarcone30_Nonprompt_All_MaxWeightTTVA_pt500_CloseByCorr",
"AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.DFCommonElectronsECIDSResult", "AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.neflowisol20",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptvarcone30_Nonprompt_All_MaxWeightTTVA_pt500", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptcone40",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptvarcone30_Nonprompt_All_MaxWeightTTVA_pt1000_CloseByCorr",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptvarcone30_Nonprompt_All_MaxWeightTTVA_pt1000", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptvarcone40",
"AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.f1", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptcone20_Nonprompt_All_MaxWeightTTVA_pt500",
"PrimaryVerticesAuxDyn.vertexType", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptvarcone30", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptcone30",
"AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.ptcone20_Nonprompt_All_MaxWeightTTVA_pt1000",
"AnalysisElectronsAuxDyn.ptvarcone30_Nonprompt_All_MaxWeightTTVALooseCone_pt500", "AnalysisMuonsAuxDyn.CaloLRLikelihood"
]
Argh - did a bunch of commits on this and forgot to put them in a branch. :-(
https://github.com/iris-hep/idap-200gbps-atlas/commit/7e25a892ae981e30b119a52512ec0b0097812b67 https://github.com/iris-hep/idap-200gbps-atlas/commit/41d775b18489951c778bdf88501e05496e592b1e https://github.com/iris-hep/idap-200gbps-atlas/commit/977785be39403973dce8191725dd6ad25b10f741 https://github.com/iris-hep/idap-200gbps-atlas/commit/695455053c639d065993e6ffad8e9605a8ce2430
@alexander-held has come up with a new set of branches we should be looking at. Now that we've solved the obscure branch reading issues in SX, we need to update to that list.